A TAXONOMY OF 4 X 4 tiles of 1 bit per pixels, according to symmetries. What symmetries am I counting?
first up, there’s two patterns that yield only two unique results after undergoing all of the above. Checkerboard, and pure black/white.
for the purposes of encoding an image, and we like variable width codes, the best way to do this seems to be to stick with the maximum width being “a code”, with smaler widths secretly being one big width code representing semantically, two or more smaller codes, this might be equivalent to huffman?
file:///Volumes/dev/organised/4x4%20experiments/enumerate256b.html
the one with the lowest numerical value. 6. produce a reverse lookup to find the canonical representation for any 16-bit number, plus the 4 bit hvri number needed to transform the canonical to the supplied. 7. for each {BPi,BPi,BPi} set: 8. For each resulting image, remap 0-7 in every permutation. 9, permute every combination of HVRI,HVRI,HVRI 10, take resulting set and apply a sequential index called 3BPi 11, and the resulting permutations to a list of {BPi,BPi,BPi} that will not be checked, skipped.
numbers to the right = 16 symmetry group ids.
ID calculated by the lowest hexidecimal numeric value of the tiles in the group, when a tiles’ bitpatterns are converted to numbers.
0000
2
5a5a
2
0F0F
4
0505
8
36c9
8, 36c9
00FF
0FF0
8, 00FF
33cc
6996
3cc3
8, 33cc
3c3c
5aa5
8, 3c3c
00F0
000F
16
0104
0208
050A
16 16
16, 05F5 16. 05FA
2184
1842
1A4A
1842
1248
2585
16 16
174d
174d
1e1e
1d47
1d47
2d2d
16 16
1 pixel, every configuration
0001
0002
0002
0020
32
2 pixels in every configuration.
0003
0022
0060
selection of 4096 tiles
center mask, all symmetries.
center mask, no shifting.
corners masking, high symmetry
corners no shift symmetry
hamming pattern
xor masking the 2x2 patterns to find sets
in other word, xor masking doubled 2x2 patterns on these 4x4 patterns can produce every other pattern.
Hamming distance of 1 from each progressive tile
removed from occurring in the rest.
in other words, each tile cannot have
same but with shifting symmetries added in. is there a difference?
hamming distance 2 eliminated
hamming 2 with xor masks
partially sorted by hand
only flipping and inversion
from the other category, some interesting groups
L: 8 o: 1e22 i: 279
L: 8 o: 1e2a i: 280
L: 8 o: 71f i: 124
one of the many x256 groups
I’ve clearly screwed something up. there’s duplicates here.